Submission : ARORDES Study Model

  • Due No Due Date
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a file upload
  • File Types doc, docx, pdf, jpeg, and jpg
  • Attempts 0
  • Allowed Attempts 2

Submission of the Final Course output in PDF file.

Make sure to put your self assessment score before your name. This will be part of the grading.

20-15 pts. -  I have exceeded my own expectations with the output I've made.

14 - 8 pts. - I am happy and satisfied with my work.

7-1 pts. - I could have done better. 

0

Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 38 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Rubric for Final Course Output_ARORDES
Rubric for Final Course Output_ARORDES
Criteria Ratings Pts
Edit criterion description
Building Components : ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
30 to >26.0 pts
MEETS STANDARDS
Excellent illustration of design and structure, very easy to identify elements across entire model
Edit rating Delete rating
26 to >21.0 pts
APPROACHING STANDARDS
Adequate illustration of design and structure, easy to identify elements, applied over majority of model
Edit rating Delete rating
21 to >0 pts
BELOW STANDARDS
No or inconsistent or unclear illustration of design and structure
pts
30 pts
--
Additional Comments
Edit criterion description
Workmanship USE OF MATERIALS PRECISION OF MODEL MAKING
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
25 to >22.0 pts
MEETS STANDARDS
Exceptional scale choice, consistent quality; Excellent in most/all model components, materials and creative modifications
Edit rating Delete rating
22 to >17.0 pts
APPROACHING STANDARDS
Good quality, age appropriate aesthetics. Good scale, ; Some variety of materials. Some creative modifications.
Edit rating Delete rating
17 to >0 pts
BELOW STANDARDS
Poor or mediocre quality and aesthetics. Scale is not used or inconsistent; No or very few creative modifications
pts
25 pts
--
Additional Comments
Edit criterion description
Assessment DEMONSTRATED MASTERY OF GIVEN TOPIC
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
25 to >22.0 pts
MEETS STANDARDS
Extremely effective visual representation of model. All elements are easy to understand. Followed all instructions
Edit rating Delete rating
22 to >17.0 pts
APPROACHING STANDARDS
Good/Very good visual representation of model, some elements not evident. Partially followed instructions.
Edit rating Delete rating
17 to >0 pts
BELOW STANDARDS
No or fair representation of model function or effectiveness. None of the instructions were followed
pts
25 pts
--
Additional Comments
Edit criterion description
SELF-ASSESSMENT
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
20 to >14.0 pts
MEETS STANDARDS
I have exceeded my own expectations in the output I've made.
Edit rating Delete rating
14 to >8.0 pts
APPROACHING STANDARDS
I am happy and satisfied with my work.
Edit rating Delete rating
8 to >0 pts
BELOW STANDARDS
I could have done better.
pts
20 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 100 out of 100